In a recently released report from consulting group McKinsey,
they claim that over the past 10 years, the marketing spend by U.S.
personal-lines insurers rose from $1.7 billion to $5.9 billion in 2011. (1)
“The auto insurance industry in the United States is one of
the most aggressive in terms of marketing spend, but it may not be having the
desired impact,” (2)
The problem is that these investments ware only targeting a
small portion of the target market, about 30%.
This is also troubling because, this segment is historically the most
price sensitive and the least loyal. “…some
carriers are spending heavily for broad brand recognition and have little to
show for it." The report suggest that more
than half of the marketing dollars spent on auto insurance in the past
decade came from carriers that didn’t gain share.
Does anyone benefit from all this spending??? The McKinsey report, indicates that only
largest companies are actually creating value.
The 5 largest insurers in the US
are recognizable to consumers and these brands maintain a high degree of depth. This is an obvious advantage for the larger
insurers when consumers decide to shop for insurance. These brands are sought
after.
So how can a smaller insure compete? The report suggest that smaller insurance
companies avoid competing with large marketing budgets and focus their efforts
on selective positioning opportunities.
“We strongly believe that there are other needs out in the
marketplace that are not being addressed and that is a bigger opportunity for
insurers,” (1)
No comments:
Post a Comment